Average number of events in a given July or August: 5.6/month
This number is higher than what one should expect, but having a high number now is what I want. This is because I will also be agumenting this criteria with dewpoint thresholds which will bring this number down to are more reasonable number. And, actually....
Criteria: 2 days of IWVF >= 90th and 1 day of DWPT >= 90th
Average number of events in a given July or August: 1.1/month
This seems low, but plotting up the events for 1984 (the year that I have most been using during my studies so far) shows a very good agreement with what days I suspect are surge events. Below I will show those days (I based this on empirical evidence from Hovmoller diagrams which I am sure there are some on previous posts) and the plot for 1984 under the latest current surge criteria.
Suspected Event Days: ~38, ~50, ~70, ~78 and ~120.
Even though the monthly average over the 28 years is low it still gives a good representation of the surge events of this year. It could stand to reason that this low number is an artifact of the rather inactive monsoon years of the 1990's. I am basing my 'normal' per month surge events on Stensrud's word which is based on a time period of mid-70's through late 80's, typically.Below is a composite of IWVF for a period 2 Days Before through 2 Days After an event. Map 3 corresponds to the event day, Map 1 and 2 correspond to 2 and 1 Days Before, respectively, and Map 4 and 5 correspond to 1 and 2 Days After, respectively.
From this data it seems clear that our IWVF is concentrated over regions adjacent, at least longitudionally, to the GoC. We can also see that as the surge happens parts of southern Nevada see very heightened concentrations relative to it's pre-surge values. Now, let's look at a composite of IWVF based on events of 1 Day of DWPT >= 90th percentile.
Well, this is a very interesting and pretty cool figure. Again, Map 3 is the event, in this case DWPT, day. Based on this figure, it appears to me that IWVF is a precursor to DWPT events. We see in the preceding days, i.e., Map 1 and 2, that the IWVF field looks similar to the the post-surge event days, i.e., Map 4 and 5, from the IWVF event figure above. This does make physical sense in that we would expect a large northward shift of winds before an increase of dewpoint at the surface. I believe next I will use look at composites of precipitable water. Since winds are not part of this variable, we will get a better idea of exactly how the atmospheric moisture is moving pre- and post-surge events. -jamie

Looks pretty good. I'm somewhat uneasy with the dewpoint criterion since 2m dewpoint is a by product of the model (likewise is precip). Moreover I think that IWV and it's flux will be better represented by NARR and are also possibly more intuitive and not biased by land surface features. Your finding that IWVF leads elevated RH values is great! This could be a form of validation, in other words if we use purely atmospheric variables to build our criteria for events and then validate them with pseudo on the ground stuff (DEWPT, PRECIP) to show they work, then that would be great. Enjoy the southwest, with the cutoff low pushing west there may be a remote chance for enhanced uplift and convection - therein proving the role of the extratropics...
ReplyDelete