2 consecutive days above 90th percentile
for a zone where event day - 1 must not meet criteria
for a zone where event day - 1 must not meet criteria
This appears to have helped out very well, and thus, I will show new and improved (and shiny, I might add) results.
Note: Since MATLAB disagrees with you about how large certain subplots should be when you start adding in colorbars, I will simply state data ranges here:
DWP Anomalies: -2:5
IWV Anomalies: -3:8
Precip Anomalies: 0:5
These restrictions are based on observed values in the data and which value range best described the data.
(1) Event for SAZ Zone
The figure includes IWVF and anomalies of Dewpoint, Precipitable Water and Precipitation. Anomalies also helped to weed-out patterns present in these fields that were not easily decernded from the basic field values. We clear see a northward flux of dewpoint, precipitable water and precipitation in relation to IWVF events. Precipitable water shows the most concurrent signature with IWVF, which should be expected as these fields are based on similar data. We can now see the slightly delayed, by one or two days, flux of precipitation and dewpoint into the AZ, NM and UT domains. As described more fully in a previous post, this is a feature we expect to see. So, things are looking good.(2) Event for SAZ and NAZ Zones
Features are similar in this figure as with (1) except that we are seeing a stronger signal in all fields compared to (1). This should be expected since we are further refining our events to cases where IWVF moved more northward, thus a strong flux.(3) All Zones (1 Day Criteria)
So, the final figure is for an event that shows up in all three zones on a given day. This event is not restricted to 2 consecutive days criteria as with above examples. Most of the signatures appear before event day for this criteria. What we are pretty much looking at in this 'event day' is the height of activity, i.e., furthest northward flux. If we were defining events of 2 consecutive days for SAZ and NAZ then it would probably show up on Day-1 here. Again, signals are very amplified here, as we should expect. Well, I am pretty to call events defined. So, Events = Defined:
Weak Event = 2 consecutive days of IWVF at or above 90th percentile for SAZ
Moderate Event = 2 consecutive days of IWVF at or above 90th percentile for SAZ and NAZ
Strong Event = 1 day of IWVF at or above 90th percentile for SAZ, NAZ and SUT
Moderate Event = 2 consecutive days of IWVF at or above 90th percentile for SAZ and NAZ
Strong Event = 1 day of IWVF at or above 90th percentile for SAZ, NAZ and SUT
-jamie

Jamie, I am glad to see the composite with anomalies helped to illustrate the surge events. We'll have to get you a code that you can use to plot actual colorbars, as these are needed. A couple things we still need to think about are being sure your "events" are spaced in time properly. For example, if we have a sequence of days (1=meets 90th percentile, 0 does not) that looks like 0001101101000 then your criteria would count 2 events, even though it is likely that we just have one event that barely missed thresholds on a couple of those intermediate dates. Small fix, I'll send you in an email a sample code to tweak this. Also, it is useful to know the number of events for each category. Furthermore, I think a strong event should be consistent with the others in that we should be looking for sequences where the entire domain is above the 90th percentile
ReplyDelete